Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
economics:meta:lorconsecon2019 [2019/06/20 11:03]
Olivier Simard-Casanova [Call for paper]
— (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-<panel type="​default">​ 
  
-<​lead>​ 
-====== Lorraine Workshop on Measuring Consensus in Economics #​LorConsEcon2019 ====== 
-[Nancy, Lorraine, France](#​venue). 22 November 2019. 
-</​lead>​ 
- 
-How to measure the scientific consensus (or lack thereof) in economics? 
- 
-<alert type="​info"​ icon="​fa fa-link">​Short URL for this page: `scasa.co/​LorConsEcon2019`</​alert>​ 
- 
-</​panel>​ 
- 
-~~DISCUSSION:​off~~ 
- 
-## Description 
- 
-One study or one result is not enough to conclude if an effect or a causal relationship actually exists. Other fields like biology or management rely on meta-analyses to assess the scientific consensus on specific research questions, but economics does not have such a tradition. As a consequence,​ it is not always easy to assess where lies the scientific consensus (if there is any). This is the question this workshop is intended to explore: how can we measure the scientific consensus (or the lack thereof) among economists? Should we rely more on meta-analyses?​ Should we poll researchers?​ Should we reward researchers who publish critical surveys? Should we explore the literature with computational text analysis? And so on. 
- 
-Polls are regularly conducted on political economy questions, for instance the [IGM Forum](http://​www.igmchicago.org/​igm-economic-experts-panel). But what about more positive or methodological questions? What economists think of (for instance) the rational expectation hypothesis? How do they perceive the use of models within the discipline? And so on. Having quantitative answers to those questions can help economists have a better understanding of their own discipline, and also help to explain economics more clearly to the general public (as in some countries, for instance in France, the perception of economics by the general public is quite different from what economics really is). 
- 
-The goal of this workshop is to explore this set of question, and also to establish contacts between economists interested by those questions in the hope of future collaborations and discussions. 
- 
-## Keynote speaker 
- 
-{{ :​economics:​meta:​customlogo.gif.jpeg?​direct&​200|}} 
- 
-Sylvain Chabé-Ferret (Toulouse School of Economics, INRA((French [National Institute of Agricultural Research](https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Institut_national_de_la_recherche_agronomique))),​ Institute for Advanced Studies in Toulouse) 
- 
-- His [website](https://​sites.google.com/​site/​sylvainchabeferret/​) 
-- His [Twitter](https://​twitter.com/​sylvaincf) 
-- [SKY](https://​chabefer.github.io/​SKY/​),​ the Social Science Knowledge Accumulation Initiative 
- 
-## Call for paper 
- 
-TBA. 
- 
-Submissions will be accepted on the following topics: 
- 
-- meta-analyses 
-- epistemology 
-- methodology of literature surveys 
-- surveys on researchers and scientists 
-- reproducibility 
-- open science 
-- transparency 
- 
-If you think one of your work could fit with the workshop but isn't on a subject listed above, do not hesitate to contact me. 
- 
-## Schedule/​timetable 
- 
-TBA. 
- 
-## Venue 
- 
-The workshop will be held at one of the Bureau of Economic Theories and Applications'​ location in Nancy, Lorraine, France. 
- 
-Nancy is renowed for its place Stanislas, the bergamote candies and our own recipe of macarons. The Lorraine region has great wines, you probably already know its quiche, and we have cool hiking spots too! 
- 
-## Partners 
- 
-- Institute of New Economic Thinking (INET), Young Scholar Initiative (YSI) 
-- Bureau of Economic Theories and Applications (BETA) 
- 
-[Julien Grandjean](https://​juliengrandjean.wixsite.com/​monsite) is supporting me in the organization of this workshop. 
  • Last modified: 6 months ago
  • by Olivier Simard-Casanova